You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 4 Category multiple logistic regression analyses on self-reported compliance with and without consent from the victim or perpetrator of IPV

From: Compliance with mandatory reporting of intimate partner violence among professionals in Norway

Item

Compliance w/o consent*

Compliance w/ consent†

OR

Sig.

CI

OR

Sig.

CI

Experience with IPV

  IPV victim – career

1.132

.040

1.006 – 1.273

1.138

.039

1.007 – 1.286

  IPV victim – 12 months

1.093

.344

.909 – 1.314

1.208

.059

.993 – 1.471

  IPV perpetrator – 12 months

.709

.045

.507 - .993

   

  Severe physical injury victim – 12 months

.924

.658

.651 – 1.311

.719

.051

.516 – 1.001

Expectations about MR-IPV

  The incident would have been reviewed at the workplace

.727

.198

.448 – 1.181

   

  There is a high probability that it would have had positive consequences for the patient/client/user

1.243

.378

.767 – 2.015

1.755

.048

1.005 – 3.064

  It would have had few consequences for my patient/client/user

.801

.232

.557 – 1.152

   

  The MR-IPV case would have made it more difficult to work afterwards

.443

.005

.252 - .779

.695

.194

.401 – 1.204

  The MR-IPV case would have few consequences for me personally

   

.828

.222

.611 – 1.121

  I would have received good and adequate support from the leaders at my workplace

.592

.125

.304 – 1.156

   

  I would have received good and adequate support from colleagues

.612

.198

.289 – 1.294

   

  I would have been confident that what I did was right

2.131

.005

1.257 – 3.612

1.676

.038

1.029 – 2.729

Perceived application of MR-IPV

  Victim

1.907

<.001

1.478 – 2.459

2.489

<.001

1.782 – 3.476

  Perpetrator

1.236

.168

.915 – 1.671

.972

.866

.704 – 1.344

Knowledge of MR

  Knowledge of MR

1.086

.782

.603 – 1.957

1.519

.174

.831 – 2.777

  Knowledge of MR in their field

1.687

.072

.954 – 2.983

1.496

.169

.843 – 1.654

  Knowledge of criteria

2.382

<.001

1.478 – 3.837

2.144

.002

1.329 – 3.456

Perceptions of MR-IPV compliance

  Compliance in general

1.328

.387

.698 – 2.527

1.769

.084

.927 – 3.375

  Compliance by colleagues

1.678

.151

.827 – 3.401

1.029

.937

.508 – 2.086

Experience with risk assessment tools

  Structural risk assessment

   

1.364

.003

1.111 – 1.674

Perceptions of workplace time management

  Time with patients etc.

.865

.042

.753 - .995

   
  1. *N range = 302 – 335
  2. †N range = 324 – 334