From: Compliance with mandatory reporting of intimate partner violence among professionals in Norway
Item | Compliance w/o consent* | Compliance w/ consent† | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | Sig | CI | OR | Sig | CI | |
County of workplace | 1.000 | .565 | .999 – 1.002 | |||
Experience with IPV | ||||||
IPV victim – career | 1.056 | .256 | 962 – 1.159 | 1.025 | .632 | .926 – 1.135 |
IPV victim – 12 months | 1.135 | .229 | .924 – 1.394 | |||
IPV perpetrator – 12 months | .938 | .584 | .741 – 1.184 | |||
Severe physical injury victim – 12 months | .784 | .094 | .589 – 1.042 | |||
Expectations about MR-IPV | ||||||
The incident would have been reviewed at the workplace | .772 | .434 | .404 – 1.476 | |||
There is a high probability that it would have had positive consequences for the patient/client/user | 1.459 | .219 | .799 – 2.668 | |||
It would have had few consequences for my patient/client/user | .860 | .517 | .546 – 1.356 | |||
The MR-IPV case would have made it more difficult to work afterwards | .615 | .167 | .308 – 1.226 | .973 | .931 | .527 – 1.798 |
The MR-IPV case would have few consequences for me personally | .779 | .227 | .520 – 1.168 | |||
I would have received good and adequate support from the leaders at my workplace | .493 | .175 | .178 – 1.368 | |||
I would have received good and adequate support from colleagues | .494 | .187 | .173 – 1.408 | |||
I would have been confident that what I did was right | 1.396 | .302 | .741 – 2.630 | 1.228 | .486 | .689 – 2.185 |
Perceived applicability of MR-IPV | ||||||
Victim | 1.407 | .043 | 1.011 -1.959 | 1.989 | <.001 | 1.408 – 2.811 |
Perpetrator | 1.617 | .015 | 1.097 – 2.385 | |||
Knowledge of MR-IPV | ||||||
Knowledge of MR | 1.227 | .620 | .546 – 2.755 | |||
Knowledge of MR in their field | 1.464 | .221 | .795 – 2.696 | 1.719 | .144 | .831 – 3.556 |
Knowledge of criteria | 1.694 | .107 | .892 – 3.219 | 1.518 | .197 | .805 – 2.861 |
Perceptions of MR-IPV compliance | ||||||
Compliance in general | 3.379 | <.001 | 1.704 – 6.703 | |||
Compliance by colleagues | 1.924 | .070 | .947 – 3.909 | |||
Experience with risk assessment tools | ||||||
Structural risk assessment | 1.205 | .114 | .956 – 1.517 | 1.118 | .312 | .901 – 1.388 |
Perceptions of workplace time management | ||||||
Time with patients etc. | .904 | .114 | .956 – 1.517 | .807 | .024 | .669 - 973 |