Table 7 Final multiple logistic regression model of choosing not to report intimate partner violence on behalf of the victim or perpetrator of intimate partner violence during the last 12 months or throughout their career

Experience with IPV

  IPV victim – career

1.334

.133

.962 – 1.336

1.098

.048

1.001 – 1.204

  IPV perpetrator – career

.857

.078

.722 – 1.017

1.352

.069

.977 – 1.870

1.286

.013

1.055 – 1.567

  Severe physical injury victim - career

1.153

.225

.916 – 1.451

1.667

.020

1.083 – 2.565

1.178

.099

.969 – 1.431

Expectations about MR-IPV

  The MR-IPV case would have made me a more secure professional

1.822

.112

.869 – 3.816

  The MR-IPV case would have few consequences for me personally

.521

.024

.296 – .918

.777

.231

.514 – 1.174

1.230

.774

.299 – 5.047

Perceived applicability of MR-IPV

  Victim

.937

.528

1.025

.729

.889 – 1.182

  Perpetrator

1.057

.641

.838 – 1.332

Knowledge of MR-IPV

  Knowledge of MR-IPV

.405

1.45

.119 – 1.367

1.892

.049

1.002 – 3.573

1.578

.341

.617 – 4.033

  Knowledge of criteria

2.651

.049

1.004 – 7.001

Perceptions of MR compliance

  Compliance by colleagues

.028

.003

.003 - .301

.544

.187

.220 – 1.345

Perceptions of workplace time management

  Time spend with patients etc.

.741

.040

.556 - .987

Work-related meetings

1.358

.338

.726 – 2.538

Impractical working conditions